All guides Practice economics

Moving a chiropractic practice from insurance to cash

GrowMed research team

Do it in stages, not overnight, and fix your report of findings before you change anything else. In a cash practice the patient is paying out of their own pocket, so every patient has to understand and agree to their care in a way an insurance patient never had to.

The reason the question keeps coming up is in the data. Average reimbursement rates in chiropractic have fallen across consecutive survey years, from 74% to 71% to 62%. The economics are moving whether you move or not.

Why this question keeps coming up

It is not fashion. It is arithmetic, and the direction is consistent across every published survey.

SourcePeriodAverage reimbursement rate
Chiropractic Economics Fees and Reimbursements Survey202169%
Chiropractic Economics Fees and Reimbursements Survey202261%
Chiropractic Economics Salary and Expense Survey202374%
Chiropractic Economics Salary and Expense Survey202471%
Chiropractic Economics Salary and Expense Survey202562%

The two surveys measure slightly different things, which is why the figures do not line up exactly. The direction is the same in both.

What that means in practice

The 2022 Fees and Reimbursements Survey, covering 301 practices, found an average fee of $64.09 and an average reimbursement of $38.

So for every $64 of care delivered, about $38 arrived. The remaining $26 was written off, chased, or absorbed.

And that is before the cost of getting the $38: the billing staff, the software, the denied claims, the resubmissions, the time spent on hold. The 2024 Salary and Expense Survey of 408 practices shows medical billing running around 1% of revenue at the median, rising to 2% at the 75th percentile, and that only captures the direct cost.

The gap between billing and collecting

The same 2024 survey reports average gross billings of $716,322 against average collections of $506,543.

That is roughly $210,000 of work billed and not collected, per practice, per year.

Every clinic knows this number exists. Most have stopped looking at it, because looking at it is demoralising and there has historically been nothing to do about it.

That is what is driving the question.

You would not be first

A useful thing to know before making a decision that feels radical: a meaningful share of the profession has already moved.

From the 2022 Fees and Reimbursements Survey of 301 practices:

Share of practices
Cash only17%
Collecting more than 75% of fees in cash23%
Collecting up to 25% of fees in cash34%

Roughly one practice in six takes no insurance at all. Another near quarter is predominantly cash.

Against about 38,000 chiropractic practice locations in the US, that is somewhere in the region of six to nine thousand clinics operating substantially on cash.

The detail that says most about direction

In the same survey, the share of practices offering a discount for cash payment fell from 28% to 18% in a single year.

Think about what that means. Cash used to be something you discounted to encourage. Now it is increasingly just the price. The profession is quietly repricing, and the clinics doing it are not losing their patients.

The average cash fee

Cash only practices reported an average fee of $65, against $64.09 across all practices.

That is worth sitting with, because it contradicts the fear that drives most of the hesitation. Cash practices are not charging less to compensate for the lack of insurance. They are charging roughly the same and collecting it in full.

The difference between a 61% reimbursement rate and collecting your fee is not a small efficiency gain. It is most of the gap between a struggling practice and a comfortable one.

What actually changes

The billing is the easy part. What changes is harder and less obvious.

The patient makes a different decision

An insurance patient asks whether something is covered. A cash patient asks whether it is worth it.

Those are different questions and they are answered in different places. Coverage is answered by a benefits check. Worth is answered by you, in the consultation room, and that is a skill most insurance based practices have never needed to develop.

This is why the report of findings is the first thing to fix, before the fee schedule, before the marketing, before anything. In a cash practice every single patient has to be persuaded, in the honest sense, that the care is worth paying for. If that conversation is weak, nothing else matters.

The marketing changes completely

Insurance practices can compete on access and convenience, because cost is largely removed from the patient’s decision. Cash practices cannot.

Insurance focusedCash focused
The patient’s questionDo you take my plan?Is this worth my money?
What the website sellsConvenience and coverageOutcomes and expertise
What proof mattersBeing in networkReviews, credentials, results
The lead that mattersAnyone covered nearbySomeone actively seeking help

This is also why discount led advertising is a trap for a cash clinic. A patient who responded to $49 has told you price is their deciding factor, and you are about to ask them to commit to full fee care. The channel that produced them has quietly selected against the thing you need.

What you stop doing

You stop chasing claims, stop writing off the gap between billed and collected, stop arranging care around what is reimbursable, and stop employing or outsourcing the function that manages all of it.

That last one is a real cost saving and it is also a real conversation with a member of staff whose role changes. Plan it rather than discovering it.

What you start doing

You start setting your own fees. You start being accountable for your own value proposition rather than an insurer’s. And you start getting paid at the time of service, which transforms cash flow in a way that is hard to appreciate until it happens.

Do this arithmetic before you decide

Four numbers. Work them out before any strategic conversation, because they determine whether this is viable for you specifically.

1. Your real collection rate. Total collected last year divided by total billed. The profession runs somewhere between 61% and 71% depending on which survey you read. If yours is well above that, you have a better insurance arrangement than most and the case for moving is weaker. If it is below, the case is stronger than you think.

2. Your true cost of billing. Staff time, software, clearing house fees, and your own hours on denials and resubmissions. Most practices undercount this because much of it is absorbed into salaried time that would exist anyway. Estimate honestly.

3. Your break even patient count. Here is the question that matters: at your cash fee, how many patients do you need to equal what you currently net from insurance patients?

If you collect $38 on a $64 fee, a cash patient at $65 is worth roughly 1.7 insurance patients. So you could see about 40% fewer patients and stand still. That ratio is the single most useful number in this decision.

4. How much of your current volume depends on being in network. This is the risk. Some patients chose you because you took their plan. A share of them will not follow you.

If you are mostly in network and most patients found you through insurer directories, the exposure is significant. If most of your patients found you through search, reviews and referrals, it is much smaller.

The honest framing

Moving to cash usually means fewer patients and more revenue per patient. That is the top quartile pattern the 2025 National Chiropractic Financial Benchmark Study identified across 72 practices: the strongest performers saw about 35% fewer visits and earned $69.24 per visit against a $52.92 median.

So the question is not “can I keep everyone”. You cannot, and that is built into the model. The question is whether the patients who stay, paying in full, produce more than the larger number paying partially.

For most practices the arithmetic works. For some it does not, and the next section is about telling them apart.

Do it in stages

The clinics that struggle with this are almost always the ones that did it in one move. A staged transition takes longer and is far more survivable.

Stage 1: fix the conversation (months 1 to 3)

Before touching a contract, get the report of findings right. Document it, practice it, measure conversion by doctor.

If you cannot convert insurance patients to recommended care plans, you will not convert cash patients, and you will have removed your safety net first. This stage is non negotiable.

Stage 2: build demand you own (months 2 to 9)

A cash practice lives on patients who choose you rather than patients routed to you. That means local search, reviews, a website that converts, and a reputation that travels.

Start this while you are still in network, because it takes months and you want it producing before you need it.

Stage 3: drop the worst plan first (months 6 to 9)

Not all of them. One. Look at your contracts, find the one with the lowest reimbursement and the highest administrative burden, and leave that one.

You will learn an enormous amount: how many patients actually leave, how the conversation goes, how your team handles it, whether your projections were right. All of it at a fraction of the risk.

Stage 4: review and repeat (months 9 to 18)

If stage 3 went roughly as projected, do the next one. If it did not, you have lost one contract rather than your practice, and you know something true about your market.

Stage 5: hybrid or full cash (month 18 onwards)

Many practices stop here deliberately, keeping one or two good contracts and running mostly cash. The survey data supports that as a real position rather than a failure to commit: 23% of practices collect more than three quarters in cash without being cash only.

Telling existing patients

Straightforwardly, in person where you can, and early.

From March we won’t be billing [insurer] directly any more. Your care won’t change. What changes is that you’ll pay at the time of your visit, and we’ll give you everything you need to claim back from them yourself if your plan covers out of network care.

Give notice, honour existing plans at the old arrangement where you reasonably can, and help people with out of network claims. Most patients who value their care will stay. Some will not, and that was always going to be true.

Who should not do this

The honest section, because this is presented as universally correct far too often.

If your report of findings conversion is weak. You will remove the mechanism that currently carries patients through and replace it with one you have not built. Fix the conversation first, or do not move.

If most of your patients came from insurer directories. Your patient flow depends on being listed. Build an independent source of demand before you remove the existing one.

If you serve a community that genuinely cannot pay out of pocket. This is a real consideration and it deserves more than a shrug. In some areas, going cash means a portion of the population loses access to care they need. Some practitioners will weigh that differently than a spreadsheet does, and that is a legitimate decision rather than a failure of nerve.

If you are already financially stretched. A transition has a dip in it. Attempting one without reserves turns a manageable decline into a crisis.

If personal injury or workers’ compensation is a large share of your work. Different economics entirely, and this article does not apply to that part of your practice.

The honest summary

The profession is moving this way, and the reimbursement data explains why. Roughly 17% of practices are already cash only and another quarter are predominantly cash.

But the practices that transition well are the ones that fixed their patient conversation first, built demand they owned second, and moved contract by contract third. The ones that struggle are the ones that resigned every contract in one month and hoped.

If you take one thing from this: the hard part is not the billing change. It is becoming a practice that patients choose and pay for directly. Build that first, and the rest is administration.

Common questions

Why are chiropractors moving from insurance to cash?

Reimbursement rates have fallen across consecutive published surveys, from 74% to 71% to 62% in the Chiropractic Economics salary surveys, and from 69% to 61% in its fees survey. The 2024 survey also shows average gross billings of $716,322 against average collections of $506,543, a gap of roughly $210,000 per practice per year.

How many chiropractic practices are cash only?

About 17% of practices are cash only according to the 2022 Chiropractic Economics Fees and Reimbursements Survey of 301 practices, with a further 23% collecting more than 75% of fees in cash. Against roughly 38,000 US practice locations that is somewhere between six and nine thousand clinics operating substantially on cash.

How do you transition a practice to cash pay?

In stages. Fix your report of findings first, build demand you own through local search and reviews second, then drop your worst reimbursing contract and learn from it before dropping another. Clinics that resign every contract in one month are the ones that struggle.

Sources

Want to know where your clinic stands?

We map every chiropractic search near you, and show you what the top three would be worth.